Metal3DPrinting.ai

Engineering evidence. Investment clarity.

Get Started

Independent metal AM

EOS M 290 vs Nikon SLM 280 2.0

Start with the differences that could affect your part. Confirm the complete configuration with each supplier.

The big difference

What this pairing comes down to

Both are Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) platforms, so the practical comparison comes down to scale and productivity configuration. Nikon SLM 280 2.0 offers the larger published build space (280 × 280 × 365 mm versus 250 × 250 × 325 mm) — more room for nesting several parts per build or for taller single parts. The spec sheet narrows the field; your volumes and quotes decide the buy case — the calculator computes the crossing for this pair.

Side by side

QuestionEOS M 290Nikon SLM 280 2.0
Quick descriptionLPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below.LPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below.
ProcessPowder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)
Build size250 x 250 x 325 mm (Z incl. build platform, application-dependent)280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 um
Energy / lasers1 × 400 W280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 um
FeedstockMetal powderMetal powder
Machine statusManufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configurationAvailability unconfirmed
Public priceFEDERAL · 2016–2024 $528,242 – $1,383,580 (dated public record, not a current quote)CLASS RECORD · 2013 No public list price (dated public record, not a current quote)

Published build-space comparison

EOS M 290250 × 250 × 325 mm
Nikon SLM 280 2.0280 × 280 × 365 mm

Proportional X and Z dimensions. Depth is listed in the numbers. Nominal envelopes are not usable part space; see configuration and platform caveats below.

Build size is the maximum published physical space. Energy or laser counts describe the machine configuration; they do not prove a throughput winner.

What do these differences actually mean?

A difference may matter when your part size, material, production plan or process qualification requires it. Confirm the exact application with both suppliers; this page does not declare a winner.

What public specs cannot tell you

Real throughputYour geometry, orientation, parameters and finishing route matter.
Actual yieldPublished specs do not tell you your accepted-part rejection rate.
Total installed priceInstallation, training, service, software and options require a current quote.
Finished-part costPrinting is only one part of the complete accepted-part route.
Service qualityLocal response, parts availability and support experience need supplier validation.
Qualified application fitPublic specs cannot approve your material, parameters, tolerances or inspection plan.

EOS M 290

CapabilitySource-backed detail
EOS M 290 build volume250 x 250 x 325 mm (Z incl. build platform, application-dependent)OEM ↗ · Source reviewed
EOS M 290 laserYb-fiber laser; 1 x 400 WOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
More published specifications and source notes
Published detailEvidence
EOS M 290 power consumptionmax 8.5 kW / typical 2.4 kW; supply 1 x 32 AOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
EOS M 290 machine footprint2500 x 1300 x 2190 mm; weight approx 1250 kgOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
EOS M 290 optics/scanup to 7.0 m/s scan; focus approx 100 um; 1 F-theta lensOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
EOS M 290 machine-level layer-thickness rangenot published as a single machine range; per-material layer values published (e.g. 316L 20/40/80 um)OEM ↗ · Source reviewed
EOS M 290 priceNo public retail price found in the cited source during the research review.OEM ↗ · Source reviewed
Materials — OEM scopeOEM-listed examples: AlSi10Mg, 316L, 17-4PH, IN625, IN718 and Ti64. Confirm the exact material/parameter set; this is not a universal qualification claim.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Machine weightApproximately 1250 kg.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Manufacturer positioningEOS presents the M 290 as a mid-sized system for qualified metal parts.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked

Nikon SLM 280 2.0

CapabilitySource-backed detail
Nikon SLM 280 2.0 envelope + lasers280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 umOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
Published build envelope280 x 280 x 365 mm (L x W x H), reduced by substrate plate thickness.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Layer thickness20–90 µm; further values available on request.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Machine dimensions / footprint3150 x 1280 x 2470 mm (L x W x H).OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Gas / atmosphere — stated scopeArgon: average 8 L/min during processing and 110 L/min during purging, per OEM brochure.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Published print speed / throughput — stated basisUp to 173 cm³/h theoretical system build rate. The OEM explicitly says this does not represent actual build rate.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
Manufacturer positioningNikon positions the SLM 280 2.0 for prototyping and serial production.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked
These public specifications cannot establish a throughput, finished-part quality, support or price winner. Confirm usable envelope, exact alloy and process parameters, effective build time, finishing and local service for both options.
Compare your quoted scenarios →EOS M 290 profile →Nikon SLM 280 2.0 profile →Public price evidence →All machines →