Metal3DPrinting.ai

Machine evidence

Find the right questions for your shortlist.

Compare any two machines →Screen your part dimensions →

Compare process, published capability and information gaps. A nominal envelope does not confirm part fit or a qualified production process.

HP

HP Metal Jet S100

Binder jetting · powder-and-sinter workflow

Manufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configuration

430 x 309 x 170 mm on the current HP platform page; an older technical brochure listed 200 mm Z, so confirm the current configuration.

View machine →Compare machines →

Bright Laser Technologies (BLT)

BLT-S400

Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)

Manufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configuration

400 x 300 x 400 mm (W x D x H), excluding substrate thickness

View machine →Compare machines →

Desktop Metal

Desktop Metal Shop System

Binder jetting · powder-and-sinter workflow

Manufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configuration

350 x 220 x 200 mm for the 16L build configuration; 4L/8L/12L options use the same 350 x 220 mm footprint with 50/100/150 mm heights.

View machine →Compare machines →

Farsoon

Farsoon FS422M

Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)

Manufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configuration

425 x 425 x 550 mm; height includes build plate; functional volume depends on part and material

View machine →Compare machines →

Compare your shortlist

Next steps for a shortlisted machine

Test whether buying beats outsourcing with your own quotes, or move straight to the quote workflow: prepare a supplier-ready brief, or contribute a de-identified quote record to the transparency dataset.

Calculate buy vs outsource →Check your part against published envelopes →Prepare a supplier-ready quote brief →Contribute a quote record →