Independent metal AM
Xact Metal XM200C vs Xact Metal XM200G
Start with the differences that could affect your part. Confirm the complete configuration with each supplier.
The big difference
- Xact Metal XM200G has the larger published build-space volume.
- Both use Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF).
- These specifications alone cannot tell us which machine will make a given part faster or cheaper.
What this pairing comes down to
Both are Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) platforms, so the practical comparison comes down to scale and productivity configuration. Xact Metal XM200G offers the larger published build space (150 × 150 × 150 mm versus 127 × 127 × 127 mm) — more room for nesting several parts per build or for taller single parts. The spec sheet narrows the field; your volumes and quotes decide the buy case — the calculator computes the crossing for this pair.
Side by side
| Question | Xact Metal XM200C | Xact Metal XM200G |
|---|---|---|
| Quick description | LPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below. | LPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below. |
| Process | Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) | Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) |
| Build size | 127 x 127 x 127 mm (125 in³; 2,048 cc) | 150 x 150 x 150 mm standard; current product page notes an extended option up to 290 mm in Z. |
| Energy / lasers | 100 W Yb fiber laser; spot size greater than 20 µm; fusing speed up to 650 mm/s | Single or dual fiber laser configurations with 100 W, 200 W or 400 W options. |
| Feedstock | Metal powder | Metal powder |
| Machine status | Legacy generation · confirm support | Manufacturer listing reviewed · confirm configuration |
| Public price | LAUNCH · 2018 $80,000 (advertised launch, 2018) (dated public record, not a current quote) | LAUNCH · 2021 $65,000 / $90,000 (2021) (dated public record, not a current quote) |
Published build-space comparison
Xact Metal XM200C127 × 127 × 127 mm
Xact Metal XM200G150 × 150 × 150 mm
Proportional X and Z dimensions. Depth is listed in the numbers. Nominal envelopes are not usable part space; see configuration and platform caveats below.
Build size is the maximum published physical space. Energy or laser counts describe the machine configuration; they do not prove a throughput winner.
What do these differences actually mean?
A difference may matter when your part size, material, production plan or process qualification requires it. Confirm the exact application with both suppliers; this page does not declare a winner.
What public specs cannot tell you
Real throughputYour geometry, orientation, parameters and finishing route matter.
Actual yieldPublished specs do not tell you your accepted-part rejection rate.
Total installed priceInstallation, training, service, software and options require a current quote.
Finished-part costPrinting is only one part of the complete accepted-part route.
Service qualityLocal response, parts availability and support experience need supplier validation.
Qualified application fitPublic specs cannot approve your material, parameters, tolerances or inspection plan.
Xact Metal XM200C
| Capability | Source-backed detail |
|---|---|
| Build volume | 127 x 127 x 127 mm (125 in³; 2,048 cc)OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Laser | 100 W Yb fiber laser; spot size greater than 20 µm; fusing speed up to 650 mm/sOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
More published specifications and source notes
| Published detail | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Layer thickness | 20–50 µm per the OEM datasheetOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Machine dimensions | Approx. 610 x 610 x 1,295 mm (W x D x H); power 100–120/200–240 VOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Generation | Historical XY-gantry machine, distinct from the later galvo-based XM200G per the OEM company historyOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Launch price | US$80,000 advertised launch price, historical (OEM press release, 2018-04-02)OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Recent exact-model research | A September 2026 forum question requests XM200C build dimensions and process parameters for Netfabb configuration; the author’s assumptions are not OEM validationTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Used supply | One identified used machine (CAE inventory, quote only); generated category/spec text excluded as unreliableTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed |
Xact Metal XM200G
| Capability | Source-backed detail |
|---|---|
| Xact Metal XM200G build volume | 150 x 150 x 150 mm standard; current product page notes an extended option up to 290 mm in Z.OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Xact Metal XM200G lasers | Single or dual fiber laser configurations with 100 W, 200 W or 400 W options.OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
More published specifications and source notes
| Published detail | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Xact Metal XM200G platform | Open material platform and open material print parameters are listed by the manufacturer.OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Xact Metal XM200G price | No exact public retail price used in the reviewed source; request a current configured quote.OEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Materials — OEM scope | OEM powder options include AlSi10Mg, 316L, 17-4PH, 718, 625, Ti64 and M300; parameter availability on request.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Layer thickness | 20–100 µm.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Machine dimensions / footprint | 650 x 780 x 1930 mm (W x D x H).OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Machine weight | Single-laser XM200G: approximately 380 kg. Dual-laser XM200G2: approximately 425 kg.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Published print speed / throughput — stated basis | XM200G approximately 6–9 cc/hr; XM200G2 approximately 12–16 cc/hr. OEM build-speed ranges, not finished-part throughput.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Manufacturer positioning | Xact Metal presents XM200G as a compact metal powder-bed printing system with single- or dual-laser configurations.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
These public specifications cannot establish a throughput, finished-part quality, support or price winner. Confirm usable envelope, exact alloy and process parameters, effective build time, finishing and local service for both options.