Metal3DPrinting.ai

Engineering evidence. Investment clarity.

Get Started

Machine evidence

Renishaw AM250: specs & public price evidence

Decision context / editorial guidance

Screen the application.
Then qualify the process.

Worth investigating if: your supplier can demonstrate the required alloy, geometry and finished-part specification on the quoted Renishaw AM250 configuration.

Do not buy on this page alone: a published envelope or machine configuration does not establish repeatability, accepted-part cost or local support.

Editorial purchasing guidance, not a verified recommendation for a particular application.

Published geometry / not guaranteed part fit

Geometry needs interpretation. Use the original published specification below; no rectangular volume is inferred.

Compare this machine →

Legacy generation · confirm support

At a glance

What is it?

Renishaw AM250 is a legacy Renishaw LPBF system — the platform the AM400 and later RenAM 500 series developed from.

How does it print?

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF): a laser melts thin layers of metal powder to build a part.

When might I consider it?

Consider it when a used AM250 is offered and the decision turns on configuration, powder handling, software transfer and remaining service support.

Build spaceNot verified from a live primary source during this review; confirm per unit with Renishaw documentationThis is the published build space for the stated configuration. Supports and process requirements can reduce usable space.
Laser configurationFibre laser per the OEM-era brochure; exact per-unit configuration requires confirmationThis describes the machine configuration. Configuration alone does not establish build speed or finished-part output.
MaterialsSee supported material evidenceConfirm the exact alloy, settings and qualified process with the supplier.
Public priceQuote requiredUse a current configured supplier quote in any economic comparison.

What public specs cannot tell you: finished-part speed, cost, quality or fit for your exact application.

Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) · Renishaw

Use in calculator →Compare machines
Availability and review notes
Legacy LPBF system; the Renishaw AM400 is documented as a development of the AM250 platform. Current new ordering and a formal end-of-support date were not established.

Source review: . Source-specific review dates appear beside each fact.

Published capabilities

CapabilitySource-backed detail
Build envelopeNot verified from a live primary source during this review; confirm per unit with Renishaw documentationOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
LaserFibre laser per the OEM-era brochure; exact per-unit configuration requires confirmationOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
More published specifications and source notes
Published detailEvidence
GenerationPredecessor of the AM400, which added revised gas flow, window protection and a 400 W optical system per the OEM 2016 reportOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
Used supplyIdentifiable used machines are quote-only (a 2015 unit with condition/hours disclosure; a separate dealer record)THIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed
Historical quote contextA 2020 university cost study reports an approximate US$675,000 OEM quote; original quotation and scope not available — historical context, not a current priceTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed · Source link unavailable (checked 2026-09-30)

Public price evidence

CLASS RECORD · 2016–2024

No verified public OEM amount exists for this legacy system. A 2020 university cost study reports an approximate $675,000 OEM quote (historical, scope undisclosed). Identifiable used machines are quote-only. Reproduced federal awards for EOS M290-class systems ($528,242–$1,383,580, 2016–2024) indicate the class, not this model’s price.

Our reproduced records ↗

Public price evidence is a dated public record — a federal award, a launch announcement or a labeled estimate — not a current retail quote. Use a configured supplier quote for any purchase decision.

More public price data and record types · Ready to talk to a supplier about this machine? Send a structured RFQ — free, no account required.

Head-to-head evidence from the same record set: Compare against EOSINT M 280 · Compare against EOS M 290 · Compare against Nikon SLM 280 2.0.

What still needs a supplier answer

Purchasing questionEvidence gap
All-in delivered machine priceCurrent quote required
Build time for your partNot verified for your geometry
Alloy and parametersConfirm the exact qualified combination
Application fitConfirm tolerances, finishing, inspection and local support

Source review dates identify when the cited material was reviewed. A source review is not a performance test; genuine third-party corroboration is identified separately.

Prepare a useful quote request

Send your exact alloy, dimensions, orientation, supports, inspection criteria and finishing route. Ask for usable build space and effective build time for that configuration. Include installation, training, service, software, gas supply and qualification in the delivered quote. Unverified fields on this page can be used as questions to confirm directly with the manufacturer before purchase.

Check material evidence →Considering this machine? Check comparable alternatives →Contribute a machine quote →Ask a question or suggest a correction →