Independent metal AM
EOSINT M 280 vs Nikon SLM 280 2.0
Start with the differences that could affect your part. Confirm the complete configuration with each supplier.
The big difference
- Nikon SLM 280 2.0 has the larger published build-space volume.
- Both use Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF).
- These specifications alone cannot tell us which machine will make a given part faster or cheaper.
What this pairing comes down to
Both are Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) platforms, so the practical comparison comes down to scale and productivity configuration. Nikon SLM 280 2.0 offers the larger published build space (280 × 280 × 365 mm versus 250 × 250 × 325 mm) — more room for nesting several parts per build or for taller single parts. The spec sheet narrows the field; your volumes and quotes decide the buy case — the calculator computes the crossing for this pair.
Side by side
| Question | EOSINT M 280 | Nikon SLM 280 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Quick description | LPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below. | LPBF machine; compare published build space and laser configuration below. |
| Process | Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) | Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) |
| Build size | 250 x 250 x 325 mm (seller-reported in the 2026 auction record; confirm per-unit configuration) | 280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 um |
| Energy / lasers | 200 W and 400 W configurations per the OEM historical account | 280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 um |
| Feedstock | Metal powder | Metal powder |
| Machine status | Legacy generation · confirm support | Availability unconfirmed |
| Public price | CLASS RECORD · 2016–2024 No public list price (dated public record, not a current quote) | CLASS RECORD · 2013 No public list price (dated public record, not a current quote) |
Published build-space comparison
Proportional X and Z dimensions. Depth is listed in the numbers. Nominal envelopes are not usable part space; see configuration and platform caveats below.
Build size is the maximum published physical space. Energy or laser counts describe the machine configuration; they do not prove a throughput winner.
What do these differences actually mean?
A difference may matter when your part size, material, production plan or process qualification requires it. Confirm the exact application with both suppliers; this page does not declare a winner.
What public specs cannot tell you
EOSINT M 280
| Capability | Source-backed detail |
|---|---|
| Build volume | 250 x 250 x 325 mm (seller-reported in the 2026 auction record; confirm per-unit configuration)THIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Laser configurations | 200 W and 400 W configurations per the OEM historical accountOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
More published specifications and source notes
| Published detail | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Generation | Predecessor of the current EOS M 290; distinct machine, not an aliasOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Documented used unit | A 2014 machine with accessories was auctioned March–April 2026; last maintenance October 2025, laser source still ~400 W, <200 h since maintenance; no public winning priceTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Historical quote context | A 2020 university cost study reports an approximate US$900,000 OEM quote used in its model; original quotation and package scope not available — historical context, not a current priceTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed · Source link unavailable (checked 2026-09-30) |
Nikon SLM 280 2.0
| Capability | Source-backed detail |
|---|---|
| Nikon SLM 280 2.0 envelope + lasers | 280 x 280 x 365 mm (reduced by substrate plate); Single 1 x 700 W or Twin 2 x 700 W; layers 20-90 umOEM ↗ · Source reviewed |
| Published build envelope | 280 x 280 x 365 mm (L x W x H), reduced by substrate plate thickness.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Layer thickness | 20–90 µm; further values available on request.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Machine dimensions / footprint | 3150 x 1280 x 2470 mm (L x W x H).OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Gas / atmosphere — stated scope | Argon: average 8 L/min during processing and 110 L/min during purging, per OEM brochure.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Published print speed / throughput — stated basis | Up to 173 cm³/h theoretical system build rate. The OEM explicitly says this does not represent actual build rate.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |
| Manufacturer positioning | Nikon positions the SLM 280 2.0 for prototyping and serial production.OEM ↗ · OEM source checked |