Metal3DPrinting.ai

Engineering evidence. Investment clarity.

Get Started

Machine evidence

EOSINT M 280: specs & public price evidence

Decision context / editorial guidance

Screen the application.
Then qualify the process.

Worth investigating if: your supplier can demonstrate the required alloy, geometry and finished-part specification on the quoted EOSINT M 280 configuration.

Do not buy on this page alone: a published envelope or machine configuration does not establish repeatability, accepted-part cost or local support.

Editorial purchasing guidance, not a verified recommendation for a particular application.

Published geometry / not guaranteed part fit

X 250 · Y 250 · Z 325 mm

Front view shows X:Z proportions. Depth Y is stated numerically. Supports and clearance reduce usable space.

Compare this machine →

Legacy generation · confirm support

At a glance

What is it?

EOSINT M 280 is a legacy EOS LPBF workhorse — the direct predecessor of the M 290 — still traded on the used market.

How does it print?

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF): a laser melts thin layers of metal powder to build a part.

When might I consider it?

Consider it when a used M 280 is offered at a price that must be weighed against recommissioning, software transfer and service questions a newer M 290 answers differently.

Build space250 x 250 x 325 mm (seller-reported in the 2026 auction record; confirm per-unit configuration)This is the published build space for the stated configuration. Supports and process requirements can reduce usable space.
Laser configuration200 W and 400 W configurations per the OEM historical accountThis describes the machine configuration. Configuration alone does not establish build speed or finished-part output.
MaterialsSee supported material evidenceConfirm the exact alloy, settings and qualified process with the supplier.
Public priceQuote requiredUse a current configured supplier quote in any economic comparison.

What public specs cannot tell you: finished-part speed, cost, quality or fit for your exact application.

Powder bed fusion · laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) · EOS

Use in calculator →Compare machines
Availability and review notes
Legacy LPBF system; the EOS historical account states it evolved into the M 290 in 2014. Formal present support status unknown — forum claims of end-of-support were not verified with EOS.

Source review: . Source-specific review dates appear beside each fact.

Published capabilities

CapabilitySource-backed detail
Build volume250 x 250 x 325 mm (seller-reported in the 2026 auction record; confirm per-unit configuration)THIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed
Laser configurations200 W and 400 W configurations per the OEM historical accountOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
More published specifications and source notes
Published detailEvidence
GenerationPredecessor of the current EOS M 290; distinct machine, not an aliasOEM ↗ · Source reviewed
Documented used unitA 2014 machine with accessories was auctioned March–April 2026; last maintenance October 2025, laser source still ~400 W, <200 h since maintenance; no public winning priceTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed
Historical quote contextA 2020 university cost study reports an approximate US$900,000 OEM quote used in its model; original quotation and package scope not available — historical context, not a current priceTHIRD-PARTY ↗ · Source reviewed · Source link unavailable (checked 2026-09-30)

Public price evidence

CLASS RECORD · 2016–2024

No publishable current new price exists for this legacy system. A 2020 university cost study reports an approximate $900,000 OEM quote (historical, package scope undisclosed). The closest dated public comparators are reproduced US federal awards for EOS M290-class mid-size LPBF systems: $528,242–$1,383,580 (2016–2024) — a class indicator, not this model’s price. A 2026 auction of a 2014 unit published no winning price.

Our reproduced records ↗

Public price evidence is a dated public record — a federal award, a launch announcement or a labeled estimate — not a current retail quote. Use a configured supplier quote for any purchase decision.

More public price data and record types · Ready to talk to a supplier about this machine? Send a structured RFQ — free, no account required.

Head-to-head evidence from the same record set: Compare against EOS M 290 · Compare against Nikon SLM 280 2.0 · Compare against Renishaw AM250.

What still needs a supplier answer

Purchasing questionEvidence gap
All-in delivered machine priceCurrent quote required
Build time for your partNot verified for your geometry
Alloy and parametersConfirm the exact qualified combination
Application fitConfirm tolerances, finishing, inspection and local support

Source review dates identify when the cited material was reviewed. A source review is not a performance test; genuine third-party corroboration is identified separately.

Prepare a useful quote request

Send your exact alloy, dimensions, orientation, supports, inspection criteria and finishing route. Ask for usable build space and effective build time for that configuration. Include installation, training, service, software, gas supply and qualification in the delivered quote. Unverified fields on this page can be used as questions to confirm directly with the manufacturer before purchase.

Check material evidence →Considering this machine? Check comparable alternatives →Contribute a machine quote →Ask a question or suggest a correction →